🔗 Share this article

The Newcastle manager isn't typically given to dramatics or grand public statements. So by his standards, his media briefing following the weekend's loss to West Ham counts as a furious tirade. Newcastle took an early lead but West Ham were ahead by the interval, while also hitting the post and having a penalty revoked by VAR, prompting Howe to execute a triple change at the half-time.

“That was the frustrating thing about the first half,” the coach stated. “Virtually any player could have been substituted and I think that was a reflection of where we were in that moment during the match and it’s very, very rare for me to have that impression. Actually, I don’t think having done so during my tenure as head coach of Newcastle, therefore I believed the squad required some shaking up at the break. This explains why I did what I did.”

Three key players all came off at the interval and Newcastle did stabilise to an extent in the second half, without ever appearing like they could get back into the game against a side that had secured just a single victory of their last nine league matches. Given how packed the centre of the standings is, with a mere three-point gap separating the top spots from mid-table, and nine points between second and 17th, a sequence of 12 points from 10 games has not placed Newcastle adrift but, similarly, they must not end the campaign in 13th.

The Issue of Perception

The problem partially is one of public view. In the Saudi Public Investment Fund, Newcastle possess the wealthiest backers in the world. The assumption when the Saudi fund bought a majority stake of the club in 2021 was that it would bring a game-changing impact, similar to the former Chelsea owner achieved at Stamford Bridge or Sheikh Mansour had at Manchester City. The distinction is that both of those owners assumed control prior to the advent of FFP regulations (and the ongoing allegations against Manchester City relate to whether they violated those guidelines once they were in place).

Profit and sustainability restrictions limit the ability of proprietors, no matter how wealthy, to spend money on their teams and so in that sense probably might have hindered any Saudi effort to raise the team to the standard of City. But there is no need for the club's spending to have been so restrained as it has been; they could have invested further and stayed inside the limit – or simply taken a relatively meagre Uefa penalty given their major problem is primarily with the European than the Premier League rules.

Infrastructure Investment and PSR Rules

Additionally, stadium development is exempted from PSR calculations; the simplest way to increase revenue to create additional financial headroom would be to expand or renovate the stadium. Given the location of St James’ Park, with protected structures on two sides, practically that probably implies constructing an entirely new stadium. There was talk in spring of possibly undertaking the short move to Leazes Park – resistance from local groups could surely have been surmounted with a commitment to build a replacement green space on the current ground location – but there has not been no movement on that plan. There has occurred significant cutbacks from the Saudi fund on a variety of initiatives as it refocuses on domestic affairs; the approach to the football club appears completely in alignment with that change of approach.

The Alexander Isak Situation

The star striker saga was arose from that conflict. A bolder management might have framed his transfer as necessary to release capital for additional spending; rather there was a unsuccessful effort to retain him. This resulted in the team began the season amidst a feeling of disappointment despite the acquisitions of Woltemade, Yoane Wissa, Jacob Ramsey, Malick Thiaw and Anthony Elanga. The opening was indifferent: one win in their initial six games.

Yet it appeared a corner was reached. They had won five in six prior to Sunday, a run that featured convincing wins of a Belgian side and a Portuguese club in the European competition. This explains the performance against West Ham was so surprising. The problem maybe is that Newcastle’s style is very aggressive, high-energy; a minor decrease in intensity can have profound effects. Maybe the strain of Premier League, European and cup competition, five games in 15 days, had got to them. Woltemade featured in each of those matches and appeared particularly fatigued.

The Nature of Modern Soccer

That’s the nature of modern football. Coaches must be ready to rotate. The manager has been unfortunate that the forward's fitness issue has left him lacking forward choices but, no matter how valid the reasons, the weekend's performance was unacceptable –especially after scoring first at a stadium primed to criticize its own side.

Howe will wish it was just a blip, an off-day when all players is below par simultaneously, but if the Magpies are to secure the European competition in the future, not to mention one day launch an genuine championship bid, they must not be as inconsistent as this.